Review



multibody software simpack v9.7  (Dassault Systemes)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Dassault Systemes multibody software simpack v9.7
    Workflow for generating the musculoskeletal <t>multibody</t> simulation model of the lower extremity with a total knee replacement. The illustration marked with * was taken from . Permission to publish is granted under a CC BY open access license.
    Multibody Software Simpack V9.7, supplied by Dassault Systemes, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/multibody+software+simpack+v9%2E7/multibody+simulation+software+simpack/pmc07287668-91-15-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    multibody software simpack v9.7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty"

    Article Title: Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Journal: Materials

    doi: 10.3390/ma13102365

    Workflow for generating the musculoskeletal multibody simulation model of the lower extremity with a total knee replacement. The illustration marked with * was taken from . Permission to publish is granted under a CC BY open access license.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Workflow for generating the musculoskeletal multibody simulation model of the lower extremity with a total knee replacement. The illustration marked with * was taken from . Permission to publish is granted under a CC BY open access license.

    Techniques Used:

    The developed musculoskeletal multibody simulation model with a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement in the lower right extremity during a dynamic squat motion combining musculoskeletal motion dynamics, knee implants with articular contact definitions, muscles, and ligaments ( A ). Detailed representation of the knee joint with implant components and muscle structures, including muscle wrapping. Note that ligaments are not shown for the sake of clarity ( B ). Investigated implant components with ligament structures of the tibio- and patellofemoral joint ( C ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: The developed musculoskeletal multibody simulation model with a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement in the lower right extremity during a dynamic squat motion combining musculoskeletal motion dynamics, knee implants with articular contact definitions, muscles, and ligaments ( A ). Detailed representation of the knee joint with implant components and muscle structures, including muscle wrapping. Note that ligaments are not shown for the sake of clarity ( B ). Investigated implant components with ligament structures of the tibio- and patellofemoral joint ( C ).

    Techniques Used: Muscles

    Validation of the musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model. The MMBS model has been validated in terms of the tibiofemoral contact force ( A ), quadriceps force ( B ) and the patellofemoral contact force ( C ) during a dynamic squat motion. The tibiofemoral contact force is compared against the in vivo measurements of instrumented total knee replacements for three subjects (K1L, K2L, K3R, and K5R) . The quadriceps force is compared against two simulation studies [ , ]. The resultant patellofemoral contact force is an important validation parameter for patellofemoral joint dynamics: it is compared against studies described in [ , ].
    Figure Legend Snippet: Validation of the musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model. The MMBS model has been validated in terms of the tibiofemoral contact force ( A ), quadriceps force ( B ) and the patellofemoral contact force ( C ) during a dynamic squat motion. The tibiofemoral contact force is compared against the in vivo measurements of instrumented total knee replacements for three subjects (K1L, K2L, K3R, and K5R) . The quadriceps force is compared against two simulation studies [ , ]. The resultant patellofemoral contact force is an important validation parameter for patellofemoral joint dynamics: it is compared against studies described in [ , ].

    Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, In Vivo

    Musculoskeletal multibody simulation of the patellofemoral joint during the dynamic squat motion ( A ). Model validity was confirmed by comparing the reported lateral ( B ), medial ( C ), and total ( D ) tibiofemoral contact forces (in unit of body weight BW) of the in vivo measurements (blue, ) to our predictions (red).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Musculoskeletal multibody simulation of the patellofemoral joint during the dynamic squat motion ( A ). Model validity was confirmed by comparing the reported lateral ( B ), medial ( C ), and total ( D ) tibiofemoral contact forces (in unit of body weight BW) of the in vivo measurements (blue, ) to our predictions (red).

    Techniques Used: In Vivo

    Tibio- and patellofemoral kinematics during dynamic squat motion. In silico (red dotted line) and in vitro (green area) comparison of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics with kinematics obtained from musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model (blue line). Comparison of anterior-posterior tibial translation with reference to the femur ( A ). Tibial internal/external rotation with reference to the femur ( B ). Patellar shift ( C ). Patellar rotation ( D ). Patellar tilt ( E ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Tibio- and patellofemoral kinematics during dynamic squat motion. In silico (red dotted line) and in vitro (green area) comparison of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics with kinematics obtained from musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model (blue line). Comparison of anterior-posterior tibial translation with reference to the femur ( A ). Tibial internal/external rotation with reference to the femur ( B ). Patellar shift ( C ). Patellar rotation ( D ). Patellar tilt ( E ).

    Techniques Used: In Silico, In Vitro, Comparison

    Related Articles

    Software:

    Article Title: Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Article Snippet: .. Implant and bone geometries, as well as relevant soft tissue structures, were modeled in the multibody software SIMPACK (V9.7, Dassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Gilching, Germany). .. A variant of the computed muscle controller (CMC) with static optimization for individual muscle force prediction was implemented in MATLAB/Simulink ® (v8.1, 2013a, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and interfaced the MMBS model via TCP/IP-communication for forward dynamic co-simulation.



    Similar Products

    multibody software simpack v9.7  (Dassault Systemes)
    90
    Dassault Systemes multibody software simpack v9.7
    Workflow for generating the musculoskeletal <t>multibody</t> simulation model of the lower extremity with a total knee replacement. The illustration marked with * was taken from . Permission to publish is granted under a CC BY open access license.
    Multibody Software Simpack V9.7, supplied by Dassault Systemes, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/multibody+software+simpack+v9%2E7/multibody+simulation+software+simpack/pmc07287668-91-15-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    multibody software simpack v9.7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Workflow for generating the musculoskeletal multibody simulation model of the lower extremity with a total knee replacement. The illustration marked with * was taken from . Permission to publish is granted under a CC BY open access license.

    Journal: Materials

    Article Title: Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3390/ma13102365

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Workflow for generating the musculoskeletal multibody simulation model of the lower extremity with a total knee replacement. The illustration marked with * was taken from . Permission to publish is granted under a CC BY open access license.

    Article Snippet: Implant and bone geometries, as well as relevant soft tissue structures, were modeled in the multibody software SIMPACK (V9.7, Dassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Gilching, Germany).

    Techniques:

    The developed musculoskeletal multibody simulation model with a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement in the lower right extremity during a dynamic squat motion combining musculoskeletal motion dynamics, knee implants with articular contact definitions, muscles, and ligaments ( A ). Detailed representation of the knee joint with implant components and muscle structures, including muscle wrapping. Note that ligaments are not shown for the sake of clarity ( B ). Investigated implant components with ligament structures of the tibio- and patellofemoral joint ( C ).

    Journal: Materials

    Article Title: Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3390/ma13102365

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The developed musculoskeletal multibody simulation model with a cruciate-retaining total knee replacement in the lower right extremity during a dynamic squat motion combining musculoskeletal motion dynamics, knee implants with articular contact definitions, muscles, and ligaments ( A ). Detailed representation of the knee joint with implant components and muscle structures, including muscle wrapping. Note that ligaments are not shown for the sake of clarity ( B ). Investigated implant components with ligament structures of the tibio- and patellofemoral joint ( C ).

    Article Snippet: Implant and bone geometries, as well as relevant soft tissue structures, were modeled in the multibody software SIMPACK (V9.7, Dassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Gilching, Germany).

    Techniques: Muscles

    Validation of the musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model. The MMBS model has been validated in terms of the tibiofemoral contact force ( A ), quadriceps force ( B ) and the patellofemoral contact force ( C ) during a dynamic squat motion. The tibiofemoral contact force is compared against the in vivo measurements of instrumented total knee replacements for three subjects (K1L, K2L, K3R, and K5R) . The quadriceps force is compared against two simulation studies [ , ]. The resultant patellofemoral contact force is an important validation parameter for patellofemoral joint dynamics: it is compared against studies described in [ , ].

    Journal: Materials

    Article Title: Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3390/ma13102365

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Validation of the musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model. The MMBS model has been validated in terms of the tibiofemoral contact force ( A ), quadriceps force ( B ) and the patellofemoral contact force ( C ) during a dynamic squat motion. The tibiofemoral contact force is compared against the in vivo measurements of instrumented total knee replacements for three subjects (K1L, K2L, K3R, and K5R) . The quadriceps force is compared against two simulation studies [ , ]. The resultant patellofemoral contact force is an important validation parameter for patellofemoral joint dynamics: it is compared against studies described in [ , ].

    Article Snippet: Implant and bone geometries, as well as relevant soft tissue structures, were modeled in the multibody software SIMPACK (V9.7, Dassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Gilching, Germany).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, In Vivo

    Musculoskeletal multibody simulation of the patellofemoral joint during the dynamic squat motion ( A ). Model validity was confirmed by comparing the reported lateral ( B ), medial ( C ), and total ( D ) tibiofemoral contact forces (in unit of body weight BW) of the in vivo measurements (blue, ) to our predictions (red).

    Journal: Materials

    Article Title: Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3390/ma13102365

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Musculoskeletal multibody simulation of the patellofemoral joint during the dynamic squat motion ( A ). Model validity was confirmed by comparing the reported lateral ( B ), medial ( C ), and total ( D ) tibiofemoral contact forces (in unit of body weight BW) of the in vivo measurements (blue, ) to our predictions (red).

    Article Snippet: Implant and bone geometries, as well as relevant soft tissue structures, were modeled in the multibody software SIMPACK (V9.7, Dassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Gilching, Germany).

    Techniques: In Vivo

    Tibio- and patellofemoral kinematics during dynamic squat motion. In silico (red dotted line) and in vitro (green area) comparison of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics with kinematics obtained from musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model (blue line). Comparison of anterior-posterior tibial translation with reference to the femur ( A ). Tibial internal/external rotation with reference to the femur ( B ). Patellar shift ( C ). Patellar rotation ( D ). Patellar tilt ( E ).

    Journal: Materials

    Article Title: Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3390/ma13102365

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tibio- and patellofemoral kinematics during dynamic squat motion. In silico (red dotted line) and in vitro (green area) comparison of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics with kinematics obtained from musculoskeletal multibody simulation (MMBS) model (blue line). Comparison of anterior-posterior tibial translation with reference to the femur ( A ). Tibial internal/external rotation with reference to the femur ( B ). Patellar shift ( C ). Patellar rotation ( D ). Patellar tilt ( E ).

    Article Snippet: Implant and bone geometries, as well as relevant soft tissue structures, were modeled in the multibody software SIMPACK (V9.7, Dassault Systèmes Deutschland GmbH, Gilching, Germany).

    Techniques: In Silico, In Vitro, Comparison